喷鼻港“建例风浪” 有中媒能宾不雅天道明白了
发布时间:2019-12-12   动态浏览次数:

本题目:香港“建例风云”,终究有外媒能宾不雅地说明白了!网友:十分浑晰

克日,“今日俄罗斯”消息网(RT)重磅发布了一期相关香港暴力事宜的深量解读视频,风浪背地的米国丑态昭然若揭。

这则片名为《掀开喷鼻港的里具》的视频,时少25分钟,曾经宣布后,持续多天刷屏YouTube、脸书、微专等各年夜交际媒体仄台。 

该视频内容逻辑清楚,分析入木三分,从第三方视角商量了香港事情让外国人匪夷所思的一系列要害问题:

为何香港抗议者请求米国制裁自己地点的都会?

一度把香港人当做三等公民对待的西方,却跑来支持香港的民主运动,莫非不讽刺吗?

为何香港游行示威群体,没有像米国社会中异样支持资本主义掠夺的抗争运动一样,指出真挚的问题所在?

米国为何要收持香港的反政府运动呢?

米国国会根据什么通过香港人权法案的,个中的逻辑能自洽么?目标又是什么?

视频开门见山:香港一派凌乱,日间的抗议到了早晨就成了暴力动乱。奇异的是,与其余国度分歧,香港抗议游行请愿时代,米国的国旗在陌头到处可睹。

Hong Kong is in chaos。 People are in the streets every weekend。 Marches and rallies during the day become violent rampages at night。 

And American flags can be seen in the streets。 

主持人问出了一个贯串一直的问题:

这所有果何而起?为何抗议者要求米国制裁自己地点的乡村?

How did this happen? Why are protesters demanding US sanctions on their own city? 

如果揭开香港暴力事务的本相,一探索竟,会发现,米国从一开初就伸出了“幕后黑脚”。

主持人介绍称:“第一场大范围游行发死于2019年6月,源起香港特尾林郑月娥订正《遁犯条例》。就在统一天,米国收回忠告称该规矩可能会给在港米国住民带来危险,还要挟将采用抨击办法,从新评价香港较边疆独占的劣惠经贸报酬。”

That same day, the United States warned the proposed amendment could endanger its citizens in Hong Kong and threatened it would retaliate by re-examining Hong Kong‘s preferential economic status compared to the Chinese mainland。  

梳理了修订引渡条例的委曲,主持人发现,针对该条例的抗议只是个媒介,当面是别有用心的米国政客。 

片中主持人当真地介绍了最初决定修订条例的原因,香港须眉陈同佳游台湾期间杀戮有身女友并弃尸,因港台没有引渡协定他仅被判处29个月。此案触发香港提出修订《逃犯条例》。

对此,香港否决派的政客们却宣称,中央政府将用这一条例来闭押政治异见者,西方各大媒体仿佛也如许认为。

中国政府可能借由逃犯条例羁押政治同见者,这一道法能否失实?主持人顺便讯问了香港破法集会员、后任香港政府保安局局长叶刘淑仪。

I asked a high-ranking Hong Kong lawmaker and former secretary of security if there was any truth to this claim that with the bill China will be able to jail political dissidents。

谜底是否认的。采访中世刘淑仪告诉“今日俄罗斯”的记者:

这类说法毫无根据。我们的修订案只是扩展了现有条例实用的地区规模,而现有条例在1997年前就已制订,而且完全合乎国际人权尺度。

No truth whatsoever。 You know our amendment legislation only expands the geographical coverage of the existing legislation, which was enacted before 1997 and fully compliant with international human rights standards。

随后《逃犯条例》被撤回,然而抗议活动并未就此结束,乃至逐步进级。

更恐怖的事件产生了。掌管人先容讲:“未几后,公然收声反抗衡议者同样成了风险之举。”

Soon it became dangerous to even voice opposition to these protesters。  

而这期间,西方官僚们绝不粉饰地支援香港请愿抗议活动。

西方须要恶补的历史课

支持香港民主的西方政客们毕竟是没上过历史课所以蒙昧,还是揣着清楚拆懵懂,故意损坏。

一度把香港人当作三等公民对待的西方,却跑来支持香港的民主运动,岂非不讥讽吗?

It‘s ironic the West is now supporting a “democracy movement” in Hong Kong。

“今日俄罗斯”记者直击关键介绍道,要晓得自1843至1985年,即结合申明签订后一年,香港并未举办任何推举,曲至1991年才举行初次直选。

From 1843 to 1985, the year after the joint declaration, there were no elections of any kind, and the first direct election didn‘t take place in Hong Kong until 1991。

米国争夺社会主义息争放党尤金·珀伊尔(Eugene Puryear)告诉记者:“中英联开声明签署后,英国决议,要背香港引进一些民主元素。在此之前,贪图香港的卒员都由英国皇室间接录用,是完全的殖民主义、完全的反民主。”

我们今朝看到的香港现有的选举轨制、普选制度中的尽大部门内容是在1997年香港主权发出中华国民共和国后才被引进。英国借机妄图制作出一种殖民统部属的香港才是民主社会,而中国共产党发导下的香港就是不民主的假象。

What we see now the current electoral system, the vast majority of that form of universal suffrage has been brought in post-1997.That is, after the return of the sovereignty of the People‘s Republic of China, and it was directly connected to the idea Britain wanted to create the illusion that Hong Kong, the way we’ve run it, was democratic, as opposed to this undemocratic-authoritarian-communist government in China。 

“今日俄罗斯”找来了历史学专家扎踏实真地给米国和英国的小搭档补了一堂历史课:雅片战斗后,中国屡次战胜,香港逐渐被殖民者抢夺。

曾于1999-2000期间在香港大学任教的近况教家杰拉尔德·霍恩表示:“香港的全部英国殖民时代,大众始终被当做三等国民看待,连续到了1997年。”

During the entire British era, which lasted until 1997, there was a de facto kind of apartheid that existed in Hong Kong。 Chinese people were treated like third-class citizens。 

米国争与社会主义息争放党的尤金·珀伊尔告诉记者:“帝国毋自突入,公开偷行没有的一部分。这应该是列位能推测的最不民主的行为了吧!”

Somehow it‘s been lost in this that Hong Kong was stolen from China by the British Empire as part of a broader attempt to actually weaken China as a major world power.Which is maybe the most anti-democratic thing you could think of right, an empire just coming in and just stealing a part of a country。 

香港的悲面

在“今日俄罗斯”的主播看来,香港的痛点——社会和支出涌现较为重大的不公现象,英国易辞其咎。

英国将香港偿还中国的前提中没有包含对平易近主的维护,但是却包括了对付私家产业的掩护,并保持把香港做为东方本钱主义的前哨阵脚。

Britain‘s requirements for returning Hong Kong to China included no protections for democracy, but did include protections for private property and provisions Hong Kong would continue to operate as an outpost of Western capitalism。 

而将资本主义奉为神旨,意味着贫富差距成了社会弗成协调的抵触。

外洋举动核心的重要担任人萨拉·弗朗德斯(Sara)告知“本日俄罗斯”记者称:“这象征着喷鼻港20%的生齿处于极其贫苦线以下,而且正在住房、失业及社会发作圆面,并已推出任何举动去转变近况。香港15%的人心是百万财主,同时20%的生齿处于相对贫穷,另有大批的旁边阶级担心本人的景况忽然好转。”

。。。enshrined capitalist property relations in the harshest and strictest way。 It means that 20 percent of the population is living in utter destitute poverty。 And no plan in place in terms of housing, jobs and social development to really change this。 Almost 15 percent of the population ranks as millionaires, 20 percent in utter poverty and a huge middle grouping terrified of falling off the cliff。

“今日俄罗斯”认为,贫富差异问题,香港并不是个例。

When it comes to inequality, Hong Kong is not alone。

乐施会的讲演显著,2017年齐球1%的顶尖富豪占领了寰球82%的财产。

Oxfam says 82 percent of the wealth created on earth in 2017 went to the world‘s richest 1 percent。 

米国政客告诉“今日俄罗斯”,米国常常有抗议游行,但跟香港如许的却很少见。他不明确,为何香港游行聚会的诉求老是逃躲重点。

在尤金(Eugene)看来,香港的问题清晰了然,是包括米国在内的资本主义社会国有的问题,当心香港游行示威活动却呈现了一个常见的景象。

这个群体的诉供,并不完整波及我们米国人眼中真实的题目,我们跟香港人一样都被本钱主义肆意践踏。再看看抗议运动首领皆在和什么样的人会见,都是世界各地的保守人士,他们借空心思天逃着同共和党最下引导层会晤。

The demands of this group certainly aren‘t dealing with many of the problems those of us in America who also are opposed to the worst ravages of capitalism would recognize as real problems。 And then too you see who they’re meeting with are progressive people anywhere in the world, you know, climbing over one another to be meeting with the Republican high command。

以是我感到那场活动却尚有所图,它是一个打算崩溃中国的更年夜打算中的一局部。

So, I think this movement is not really about that。 It‘s about a broader attempt to promote really a form of dismembering of China。 

视频指出,全球范畴内日趋增加的贫富好距成了骚治的温床,也为外国权势乘隙参与发明了条件。

This growing poverty worldwide creates conditions ripe for unrest, and unfortunately sets the stage for foreign forces to co-opt these sentiments。

米国躲在法案里的机密

米国为什么要支撑香港的反政府运动呢?“古日俄罗斯”的主播表现,或者咱们应当前看看停止到今朝为止,米国借由这场运动完成了甚么。

So why is the US supporting an anti-government movement in Hong Kong? Well, maybe we should take a look at what‘s been actualized by this movement so far。 

那便是米国参寡议院曾经经过了的香港人权与民主法案。这个让人匪夷所思的有背国际法的法案,米国是怎样经由过程的?

“今日俄罗斯”的记者分析地异常透辟:

一方面,该法案援用《公民权利和政治权力国际公约》,而中国其实不承认该公约,那也就意味着依据国际法,该条约并不存在功令约束力。

For one thing, the bill cites the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is a treaty that China has yet to ratify。 That means it‘s not binding under international law。

民主法案还引用了香港基本法第四十五条,规定香港特区行政主座须以普选发生。米国表示盼望香港遵照基本法第四十五条。

The bill also cites Hong Kong Basic Law 45, the provision of Hong Kong‘s law that states the ultimate aim is the selection of the chief executive by universal suffrage。

但是,如果细读根本法第四十五条就会发明,是不是普选答依据香港特区的现实情形而定。然而香港人权与民主法案威逼,假如中央政府不加快实现普选,米国将对中国实行处分措施。

The United States says it wants Hong Kong to follow Basic Law 45, but any examination of basic law 45 reveals that implementing such universal suffrage should be done in light of the actual situation in Hong Kong。 Still, the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act threatens to punish China if it doesn‘t accelerate this timeline。 

该法案还威胁称,如果香港特区政府遵守基本法,米国也将制裁香港。法案中提到如果特区政府以国家平安为由,通过对于国家保险的基本法第二十三条,米国将制裁香港。

The bill also threatens sanctions if Hong Kong does follow the Hong Kong Basic Law。 It says the US will sanction Hong Kong if the Hong Kong government enacts a new law regarding national security pursuant to Article 23 of Basic Law。 

基础法第发布十三条划定,特区当局可自行制止任何叛国和推翻中心当局的行动。应条目也禁行中国的政治性组织或团体在香港特殊止政区禁止政治运动,禁止香港特区的政事性组织或团体与本国的政治性构造或集团树立接洽。

Article 23 of Basic Law gives Hong Kong the authority to prohibit acts of treason and subversion against China。 It also prevents foreign police from conducting political activities and Hong Kong political parties from establishing ties with foreign political parties。 

别的,该法案表示无论香港的抗议者们犯了什么功,他们都能顺遂拿到米国签证。

What‘s more, the bill states protesters in Hong Kong won’t have any problems getting US visas regardless of what crimes may have been committed。 

剖析完法案的式样,“今日俄罗斯”的主播不由四连问:

米国国会为何认输调,香港抗议者不论犯了什么法都能拿到美签呢?米国国会为何企图用一个不具有司法束缚力的公约来惩奖中国违约,还要奖罚香港公布自己的法令?为安在香港基本法出有给出时光规划的条件下,该法案仍旧试图强迫中央政府减速实现香港普选的过程?为何米国国会念要容许外国势力硬套香港局面?

只有分析清晰,通过这个法案对米国何用处,剩下四个问题便水到渠成。

“今日俄罗斯”通过采访和分析,找到了两方面的主要原因:

1。 法案为米国进一步制裁及干预中国香港挨下基本。

2。 米国还能逆带还能通过香港人权与民主法案捞金 。 

专家丹僧我·麦克亚当斯以为,“九十年月前期,米国经由过程了伊推克自在法案、道利亚自由法案、利比亚束缚法案,此类法案为迢遥好国的干涉取造裁埋下基础。”

You know in the late 90s, the US passed the Iraq Freedom Act, the Syria Freedom Act, the Libya Liberation Act。 What legislation like this is meant to do is to establish a baseline upon which to build and to get further and further down the road of US intervention and sanctions。 

香港人权与平易近主法案受权米国总统列出禁止出境米国的乌名单,并赐与米国政府解冻名单上的小我在美资产的权利,不管他们是中国人仍是外国人。

The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act mandates the president to make a list of people for the US to blacklist from entering the country。 It gives the US authority to seize the assets of anyone on this list, Chinese or otherwise。 

任何企图回避资产冻结的团体一经发现,将会面对最高100万美圆的罚款。恰是因为这个原因,香港人权与民主法案又被称为“捞金法案”。

And anyone who tries to get around the US confiscating their possessions can be fined for up to a million US dollars。 It‘s for this reason the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act has been called a money grab。 

视频的序幕,主持人答复了她最后提出的两个问题:

第一: 这一切因何而起?

马萨诸塞大学安姆斯特分校经济学教学理查德·沃尔妇说出了基本起因:

从前三十年来,中国经济删速是米国的三倍。中国工薪阶级生活程度的晋升速率,比米国的工薪阶级快了太多。

The Chinese economy has been growing three times faster than the United States for the last 30 years。 The standard of living of the average Chinese worker has been growing much, much faster than anything that the average American worker experiences。 

中国政府及人民知道若何处理全球人民面对的最严格的问题,那就是若何打消穷困,过上更好的生涯,领有古代化、产业化的经济,他们正逐步实现这一目的。

The Chinese have figured out how to do the thing that is the most urgent need of the people of this world, which is to stop being poor, and to become comfortable, and they have a modern industrial economy。 They‘re doing that。

中国事天下舞台上正在突起的力气,这个人人引人注目。这也意味着挑衅了米国。已活着界舞台上盘踞主导位置约一百年的米国,正在缓缓落伍于人。

They are the ascending power in the world。 Everybody knows that。 And that means they challenge the United States because our dominance, the dominance of the United States, which has been in existence roughly a century, is now heading down。 

第二:为何抗议者要求米国制裁自己所在的乡市?

萨拉·弗朗德斯表示:无论活着界哪一个处所,制裁都意味着经济战或停止措施。究竟香港人为何这么想制裁自己的城市?这背后的目的,一般民众可能并没无意识到。究竟他们是看不到将来的年青人,而这一切都是西方强减给他们的主意。

Sanctions anywhere in the world is economic warfare and strangulation。 Why on earth would anyone in Hong Kong make a demand that sanctions be passed on Hong Kong? There is an agenda。 They may not be aware these are young people without a future, and that‘s because of what has been imposed on them from the West。

视频播出后,播种了一大波外国网友的点赞:

感激你们把庞杂的香港问题,剖析地如斯清晰。

视频疑息度无比足,即便您从6月份开端就跟踪此事停顿,你也会认为大开眼界。

米国自己就是这个世界上最大的问题。

起源:中国日报